Legal Opinion

Gaulding v. Gaulding

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 14, 1953No. 18148PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Almand, Justice.

The defendant in error moves to dismiss the bill of exceptions because, as he contends, the record does not show that any judgment was entered on the verdict of the jury, and there being no final judgment, the writ of error here is premature.

The bill of. exceptions, as certified by the trial judge, recites that “the jury returned a verdict finding in favor of the validity of the deed, and thereupon a decree was entered, in said matter.” The bill of exceptions specifies, as a part of the record, the decree of the court. The clerk’s certificate to the transcript of the record…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Georgia Power Co. v. PuckettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. FlemisterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Widincamp v. WidincampSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  4. Broach v. KellySupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  5. Payne v. ThebautSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Standridge v. StandridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  2. Strickland v. ChewningSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API