Legal Opinion

J. G. Brill Co. v. Norton & Taunton Street Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 27, 1905PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

[After the foregoing statement of the case.] It is settled by Usher v. Raymond Skate Co. 163 Mass. 1, and the cases there cited, that a corporation is not liable on an accommodation indorsement in the hands of one who takes with knowledge of that fact. Such an indorsement is ultra vires. That means that the corporation would not be liable on it even if it had been authorized by all the directors and the majority of the stockholders. Nevertheless, when a person takes a negotiable note before maturity signed by a corporation in due course of business from one who apparently has received it for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boston Steel & Iron Co. v. SteuerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  2. Merchants' National Bank v. Citizens' Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  3. Beacon Trust Co. v. SoutherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  4. Craft v. South Boston RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  5. National Bank of Commonwealth v. LawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Allen v. Puritan Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Liberty Trust Co. v. TiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Merchants' National Bank v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Boston Box Co. v. ShapiroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  5. Johnson & Kettell Co. v. Longley Luncheon Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API