Legal Opinion

O'CONNELL v. Kennedy

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 15, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

This is an action of contract to recover back the price of a horse sold by the defendant to the plaintiff and paid for by him. The declaration is in four counts, and as amended alleges in count 1 the breach of an implied warranty of fitness, in count 2 the breach of an express warranty of similar character, in count 3 the breach of an implied warranty of fitness and the failure to accept the return of the horse in accordance with the “usage” of those engaged in like activities, and in count 4 a false representation of fitness. Verdicts were returned for the plaintiff on counts 1 and 2 and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Leavitt v. Fiberloid Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. Gould v. SteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  3. Leonard v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  4. Kurriss v. Conrad & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Miller v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Softub, Inc. v. Mundial, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
  2. Universal Major Electrical Appliances, Inc., a Body Corporate v. Glenwood Range Company, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
  3. Best Buick, Inc. v. WelcomeMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API