Legal Opinion

Gold Medal Farms, Inc. v. Rutland County Co-Operative Creamery, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 1959PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cooír, J.

In the interest of clarity and brevity the plaintiff-respondent, Gold Medal Farms, Inc., will be designated herein ‘ ‘ Gold Medal ’ ’; the defendant-appellant Rutland County CoOperative Creamery, Inc., will be ‘ ‘ Rutland ’ ’, the defendant-appellant Vermont Milk and Cream Company, Inc., will be designated “Vermont”, and the defendant-appellant The Borden Company will be designated “Borden ”,

The complaint alleges three causes of action which may be briefly described as follows: (1) against Rutland for breach of contract for the sale of milk; (2) against Vermont and Borden for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hornstein v. PodwitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. John E. Rosasco Creameries, Inc. v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Campbell v. . GatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Swift & Co. v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. Pakas v. . HollingsheadNew York Court of Appeals · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Guard-Life Corp. v. S. Parker Hardware Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  3. Don King Productions, Inc. v. DouglasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  4. Charles C. Chapman Building Co. v. California MartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Hidden Brook Air, Inc. v. Thabet Aviation International Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API