Legal Opinion

Hicks v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 15, 1986No. F-83-263PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRETT, Judge:

The appellant, Troy Lee Hicks, was charged by information in the District Court of Tulsa County, Case No. CRF-82-1394, with the detestable and abominable crime against nature (oral-vaginal copulation), in violation of 21 O.S.1981, § 886 and Burglary in the First Degree, in violation of 21 O.S.1981, § 1431. He was convicted on each count and sentenced respectively to three (3) years’ and seven (7) years’ imprisonment.

We reverse the conviction for crime against nature but affirm the judgment and sentence for burglary in the first degree.

On February 13, 1982, G.K.M. and her…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gibbons v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Mahorney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
  4. Bowen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Black v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Plotner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. Salyer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  5. Dunham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API