Legal Opinion

Conroy v. Dunlap

California Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1894No. 18282PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Placer County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C.

O. W. Hollenbeck was engaged in the business of banking in Placer county, and on October 31, 1892, the doors of his banking house were closed and payments suspended, he being insolvent. At that time the defendant was indebted to him in the sum of three hundred and twenty-one dollars and eighty cents, for money loaned, and he was indebted to one Mrs. S. J. Dunlap in the sum of three hundred and thirty-nine dollars and ninety-eight cents, for money deposited in his bank by her. On November 1, 1892, Mrs. Dunlap, for a valuable consideration, assigned and transferred in writing her…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. HoagSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Hitchcock v. RolloU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1872
  3. Hovey v. Home Ins. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1874
  4. In re City Bank of Savings, Loan & DiscountDistrict Court, D. California · 1873
  5. Lloyd v. TurnerDistrict Court, D. California · 1879

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dyer v. SebrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API