Legal Opinion

Van Note v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 27, 1978No. 77-1738PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment and sentence in a burglary and sexual battery case. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

During the trial judge’s preliminary remarks to the jury venire he said:

We are here to try a case. We are here to get a verdict in the trial of this case as to each charge. It takes a unanimous verdict from all six people that the defendant is guilty before he can be found guilty or that the Defendant is innocent before he can be found innocent as to each charge.

We don’t want a hung jury. It is possible to have a hung jury. It is conceivable you can’t…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Shaw v. ShawSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  3. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  4. McDole v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  5. Lavigne v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Farrow v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Ragen v. Paramount Hudson, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Mahan v. Parliament InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Gallagher v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API