Legal Opinion

Lytle v. Fulotka

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 3, 1925No. 13478PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, O.

Parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court. Susan Eulotka, Wiesley Kelley, Eliza George, and Lydia Vann, a minor, by her guardian and next .friend, Connie Murphy, sued C. F. Lytle to quiet title by cancellation of deeds and 'to recover title and possession and profits of -real estate. R. I. Bil-by and N. V. Bilby, heirs of, and N. V. Bilby, administrator of, the-estate of John S. Bil-by, deceased, intervened to defend the warranty deed of John S. Bilby-. Jacob A. Bearman was made a party by order of the court for the same purpose. Plaintiffs Viera the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McIntosh v. HoltgraveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Allison v. CrummeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Pyeatt v. EstusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Berry v. TollesonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Johnson v. FurchtbarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stewart v. KeyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Lowery v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Dierks v. IsaacSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Haymond v. ScheerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  5. Lincoln v. Tidewater Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API