Legal Opinion

Dolin v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided January 4, 1988No. Docket No. 21174-85UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

Held: Respondent's determination that petitioner Nathan Dolin received income in his capacity as general partner sustained. Held further, petitioners are entitled to a deduction in 1981 in the amount of $ 108,000 for payment for investment advice.

1Opinion of the Court

NATHAN DOLIN AND MOLLY DOLIN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Dolin v. Commissioner

Docket No. 21174-85.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1988-2; 1988 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 2; 54 T.C.M. (CCH) 1448; T.C.M. (RIA) 88002;

January 4, 1988.

Held: Respondent's determination that petitioner Nathan Dolin received income in his capacity as general partner sustained. Held further, petitioners are entitled to a deduction in 1981 in the amount of $ 108,000 for payment for investment advice.

Richard R. Katcher, for the petitioners.

Richard S. Bloom, for the respondent.

WHITAKER

MEMORANDUM…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Helvering v. WinmillSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Seligman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  3. Aero Rental v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
  4. Leahy v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
  5. Cagle v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Berkery v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
  2. Berkery v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API