Legal Opinion

Wasserman v. Lupis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order granting motion to punish defendant for contempt reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The provisions in the judgment directing defendant to pay money to plaintiffs may only be enforced by execution and may not be enforced by proceedings in contempt. (Gen. Const. Law, § 28-a; Judiciary Law, § 753, subd. 3; Civ. Prac. Act, § 504, subd. 1; Id. § 505, subds. 1, 2, 4; Kittel v. Stueve, 11 Misc. 279; affd., 146 N. Y. 380; Harris v. Elliott, 163 id. 269; Leerburger v. Watson, 169 App. Div. 48, 52.) Rich, Young, Seeger and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kittel v. StueveNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
  2. Leerburger v. WatsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Bellovin v. Sheriff of Kings CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  2. National Surety Corp. v. SilverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API