Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Hawks v. City of Topeka

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 12, 1952No. 38,681PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wertz, J.:

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff’s petition. Appellant will hereinafter be referred to as plaintiff and appellees as the city or city of Topeka. Plaintiff’s action is a proceeding in the nature of quo warranto brought in the name of the state of Kansas on relation of the county attorney of Shawnee county against the city of Topeka, a municipal corporation, and the mayor and city commissioners of the city to question the validity of two ordinances of the city of Topeka; the first, by which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Voran v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. RobbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  3. State ex rel. Mellott v. McCombsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. Tague v. HUDSPETH, WARDENSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Martin v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. State v. O'CONNORSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  3. Clark v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  4. State Ex Rel. Martin v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API