Legal Opinion

Hankins v. Mathews

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1968PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Me. Chiee Justice Buenett

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The parties will hereinafter be referred to as they appeared in the trial court; that is, James A. Hankins, et al., complainants, and Virgil Mathews, et al, defendants.

We are asked on this appeal to ascertain the legal consequences of certain provisions contained in the will of one A. A. Hankins. Mr. Hankins died testate on January 31,1952, leaving a will, the pertinent provisions of which read as follows:

“Second. In the event my wife, Sarah Elizabeth should survive me I give, devise and bequeath to her all of my personal property of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Andrews v. HallNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Keeling v. KeelingTennessee Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baskin v. Commerce Union Bank of Rutherford CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
  2. Stewart v. Hester (In Re Hester)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1981
  3. Arthur B. Roberts v. Robert BaileyTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Root v. MackeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  5. Godoy v. LinznerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API