Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Di Matteo

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1975PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVito J. Titone, J.

In this prosecution of three codefendants for bribery of a public servant (Penal Law, § 200), the defendants move for an audibility hearing of a tape recording made of a conversation or conversations of one or more of defendants, either made with a law enforcement officer, or overheard by said official.

Motion is granted. The People shall permit the defendants and their attorney to hear such recording or recordings not less than 10 days before trial, and also have scientific tests performed as to the integrity of such tape or tapes. Furthermore, the People shall furnish defendants’ attorney…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. People v. Utley, New York County Courts1974
  3. People v. BlairNassau County District Court · 1970
  4. People v. SteinmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. People v. RaoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. People v. GreenCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1975
  5. People v. ChristieNew York Supreme Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API