Legal Opinion

Higgins v. the Educators

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 10, 1941No. Appeal, 337PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadtpbld, J.,

This is an appeal from an order of the court below, striking off an appeal from a judgment in an action of assumpsit brought before an alderman and dismissing a rule to show cause why the appeal should not be perfected nunc pro tunc.

The facts are undisputed and are correctly set forth in the opinion of the court below, Palmer, P. J., from which we quote in part as follows: “This case was heard on January 25, 1941, before Alderman Faulls of the First Ward of the City of Pottsville, who entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant in the sum of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wise v. Cambridge Springs BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Marcus v. CohenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Kaumagraph Co. v. Thissen Silk Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Klugman v. Gimbel Bros.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Adelman, Trustee v. J. McShain, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Tuttle Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Maxton v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Perin v. GochnauerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API