Legal Opinion

Rudolph Wurlitzer Co. v. Dickinson

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1910PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the Branch Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on writ of error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Anthony J. Clarity, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carter

This is an action of the fourth class, brought in the municipal court of Chicago by appellee, the Rudolph Wurlitzer Company, against appellant, Charles F. Dickinson. After a trial before a jury a judgment was entered against appellant for $761.01. The Appellate Court affirmed this judgment. A certificate of importance having been granted by that court, this appeal followed.

Appellee is an Ohio corporation dealing in musical instruments, with a branch place of business in Chicago. At the time the debt was contracted the appellant was a retail dealer in musical instruments in Chicago. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lassers v. North-German Lloyd Steamship Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910
  2. City of Chicago v. CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Haines v. Knowlton Danderine Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Elias v. Boone Timber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Meek v. Chicago Railways Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1913
  4. Meinhard, Greeff & Co., Inc. v. EdensCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
  5. Chicago & Riverdale Lumber Co. v. GarsideAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API