Legal Opinion

Azaretta v. Manalla

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 2000No. 00-CA-227PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

h JASMINE, Judge, Pro Tempore.

The defendant-appellant, Vincent Manal-la, appeals from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff-appellee, Gwyndolyn Azaretta, enforcing the payment of a promissory note executed by the defendant. At trial, Mr. Manalla claimed the note was unenforceable for failure of consideration. However, the trial judge entered judgment for the plaintiff, finding that the defendant had acknowledged a natural obligation by -executing the note. For the following reasons, we affirm.

FACTS

Gwyndolyn Azaretta and Vincent Manal-la’s long-standing personal relationship evolved into a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arceneaux v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  2. Merchants Tr. & Sav. Bank v. DON'S INTERN., INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Chenault v. C & H ENTERPRISES, LTD.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Deshotels v. DeshotelsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. E. Smith Plumbing, Inc. v. ManuelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Nijel Young Versus Hard Rock Construction, L.L.C., Hard Rock Construction of Louisiana, L.L.C., and All South Consulting Engineers, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Opinion Number, Louisiana Attorney General Reports2007
  5. Ville Platte Concrete Service, Inc. v. Joshua Paul Manuel, Et Ux.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API