Legal Opinion

Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas v. Luten

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1921No. 189-3237PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSadler, P. J.

A statement of the case is not necessary here. It is fully given in the opinan by the honorable Court of Civil Appeals, to which reference is made. 203 S. W. 909. An inspection of the court’s charge discloses error in the fourth paragraph, which is not relieved by any subsequent paragraph of the main charge, nor by any special charge given. The objections presented to this charge were that it placed -a greater burden of care upon the defendant than is imposed by law, and that it was upon the weight of the evidence.

In paragraphs 1 to 4, inclusive, the court charged the jury;

“(1) You are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas v. LutenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Hutcherson v. Amarillo St. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Farris v. Interstate Circuit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  2. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. of Texas v. LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Lancaster v. BrowderTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  4. Missouri, K. T. R. Co. v. LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Lancaster v. BrowderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API