Buffett v. Jaramillo
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1DissentHartz, Judge
I respectfully dissent.
The question before this Court is whether to require Appellees — Fabian Mascarenas, Martin Vargas, and Albino Chacon — to submit to a new trial, even though the jury exonerated each of them from any responsibility in the death of Boyd Buffett. The majority does not base its ruling on any error in the jury instructions regarding the liability of Appellees or on any error with respect to the admission or exclusion of evidence regarding their liability. One indication of the remoteness of the connection between the case against Appellees and the alleged errors requiring a…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Woolwine v. Furr's, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- McEwen v. City of NormanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- American Home Assurance Company v. Sunshine Supermarket, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Beatrice Mae Hansen v. Johns-Manville Products Corporation, Johns-Manville Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.