Legal Opinion

Horrigan v. City of Pittsfield

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 30, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 32, § 83, which in an earlier form was accepted by vote of the city council of Pittsfield, provides for the retirement on pension by the mayor and aldermen of a disabled police officer who has performed faithful service for twenty years continuously or whose disability has resulted from injuries sustained in the performance of duty. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 32, §§ 56-60, provide for the retirement on pension of war veterans for various causes, but do not take effect in any city until accepted by the mayor, who is “the “retiring authority.” The plaintiff is a war veteran who has…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rich v. Mayor of MaldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  2. Bushell v. Mayor of MaldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Town of Lexington v. Town of BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Horrigan v. Mayor of PittsfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Brucato v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  4. Weiner v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  5. Lenox v. City of MedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API