Legal Opinion

Kirkbride Drilling & Oil Co. v. Satterlee

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 6, 1912No. 1592PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Brror from Superior Court, Muskogee County; Farrar L. McCain, Judge. Action by D. C. Satterlee against the Kirkbride Drilling & Oil Company to foreclose a chattel mortgage. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

Plaintiff in error by this appeal presents but one question to this court for consideration. It is charged by specification No. 2 of the assignment of errors that the court erred in rejecting certain testimony offered .for the purpose of showing that an extension of time had been granted plaintiff in error by John A. Connelly, the mediator, named in the chattel mortgage. It appears from the record that the debt secured by the chattel mortgage was in the sum of $2,200 and interest, evidenced by fifteen promissory notes, the first one due August 5, 1909, and one each…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Motive Parts Warehouse v. Facet EnterprisesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  2. Mac Adjustment, Inc. v. Property Loss Research BureauSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Brooks v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  4. Futoransky v. PopeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Blankenburg v. Norval & Dial, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API