Legal Opinion

National Bond & Investment Co. v. Howard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 6, 1926Published

1Per curiam

Action in the City Court of Buffalo on a promissory note made by defendant to the Woodward Motor Company, Inc., and by it negotiated to plaintiff. The answer pleaded a conditional delivery with fraud in the negotiation and notice thereof to plaintiff' and also pleaded usury. Plaintiff had judgment which was reversed and a new trial directed by the Special Term upon appeal. Plaintiff appeals.

Thé evidence on behalf of defendant was sufficient to cast upon plaintiff the burden of showing it was a holder in due course, and upon all the evidence the question was for the jury. (Joy v. Diefendorf,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Joy v. . DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Eastman v. . ShawNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Hoberg v. SofranscyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API