Legal Opinion

City of New York v. Flatto

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1936Published

1Opinion of the Court

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by providing that the defendant Flatto have costs in this court and in the Appellate Division against the defendant Kittanning Sales Company, Inc. (See 271 N. Y. 244.)

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of New York v. FlattoNew York Court of Appeals · 1936