Legal Opinion
City of New York v. Flatto
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 5, 1936Published
1Opinion of the Court
Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by providing that the defendant Flatto have costs in this court and in the Appellate Division against the defendant Kittanning Sales Company, Inc. (See 271 N. Y. 244.)
2Cases cited1 opinion
- City of New York v. FlattoNew York Court of Appeals · 1936