State ex rel. Mullis v. Mathews
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion
On the Merits.
2Per curiam
After the disposal of the matters o-f pleading discussed above, the respondent interposed a plea of not guilty.
The cause came on for hearing and there was voluminous testimony given ore tenus before the court.
It is shown above that the only charge upon which the removal of the respondent sheriff is sought is “willful neglect of duty.” There are twenty-four specifications under that charge, all of which, broadly stated, allege that the respondent willfully neglected to perform his duty relative to the enforcement of the gambling laws of this state. In substance, the…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. HastySupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- State Ex Rel. Green v. One 5¢ Fifth Inning Base Ball MacHineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- State ex rel. Attorney-General v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Nelson v. State ex rel. BlackwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Roberts v. State ex rel. CooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.