Busy Bee Inc. v. Corestates Bank N.A.
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County
1Opinion of the Court
NEALON, J,
— The defendant Bank in this lender liability action has filed a Frye motion pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 207.1, challenging the methodology used by the borrowers’ damages experts to compute the financial losses allegedly caused by the Bank’s wrongful conduct. Based upon the evidence presented during the Frye hearings, the business valuation approaches utilized by the borrowers’ experts do not involve novel mathematical principles and, to the contrary, are generally accepted methods in the business valuation field. Therefore, for the reasons set forth below, the Bank’s motion to exclude…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Grady v. Frito-Lay, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Atacs Corporation Airtacs Corporation, in 97-1812 v. Trans World Communications, Inc., in 97-1813. Nos. 97-1812, 97-1813Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Reading Radio, Inc. v. FinkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.