American-Foreign Steamship Corp. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1DissentWaterman, Circuit Judge
I concur with the majority that the purported appeal in No. 24283, Dich-mann, Wright & Pugh, Inc. v. United States, should be dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.
With respect to the issues relative to jurisdiction that the majority find to have been raised in the other thirteen cases and which in their judgment require remand to resolve, I concur in the dissenting opinion of Judge CLARK. I would hold, with him, that the respective written instruments in each case, all of which contain the identical Clause 13, need no further judicial consideration below to make them properly…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sword Line, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Sword Line, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Sword Line, Inc., Libelant-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- A. H. Bull Steamship Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- American Eastern Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956