Legal Opinion

Brothers v. Graves

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1889PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to the district court for Webster county. Tried below before Gaslin, J. cited: Ahlinan v. Meyer & Sehurman, 19 Neb., 68. Marseilles Mnfg. Co. v. Morgan, 4 Neb., 69. Nelson v. Geary, 15 Neb., 535. Blystonev. Burgett, 10 Ind., 28. Wells on Replevin, Secs. 223-312. Smith & Co. v. MeLeah, 24 Iowa, 329. Jordan v. Hamilton County Bank, 11 Neb., 501. cited: Wooster v. Lyons, 5 Blackf. (Ind.), 60. Leaphardt v. Sloan, Id., 278. Addison Contracts, Sec. 40.

1Opinion of the Court

Reese, Ch. j.

This case was tried upon a stipulation of facts, in connection with the deposition of one witness, and copies of certain notes and a chattel mortgage. The facts as agreed upon were, substantially, that on the 6th day of November, 1885, plaintiffs'were engaged in the business of buying and selling horses and mules, at Hastings, in this state; that on that day a man came to their barn and gave his name as Albert McCoyl, representing that he resided in and was engaged in farming on the 'northwest' quarter of section sixteen, township four, range 10, Webster county, near the town…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Loser v. Plainfield Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  2. Mackey v. ColeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
  3. New England National Bank v. Northwestern National BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Fincher v. HaneganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
  5. Brayton v. BeallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API