Legal Opinion
Doe v. North Tonawanda Central School District
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 31, 2012PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: On a prior appeal, we held that Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in granting claimant’s application for leave to serve a late notice of claim based on allegations that *1284one of respondent’s teachers had sexually abused her when she was a student at respondent’s elementary school (Doe v North Tonawanda Cent. School Dist., 88 AD3d 1289 [2011]). Respondent now appeals from an order denying its motion for leave to renew claimant’s application for leave to serve a late notice of claim. The court properly denied the motion. A motion for leave to renew “shall be based upon new…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Garcea v. BattistaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Doe v. North Tonawanda Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Webb v. Torrington Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Davidoff v. East 13th Street Tifereth PlaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by9 opinions
- CROISDALE, SANDRA J. v. WEED, ROBERT R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Jones v. City of Buffalo School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Fuentes v. HoffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Larke v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- FUENTES, SHANA v. BEVIVINO, MARIOAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.