Wyman v. Northern Pacific Railroad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Anoka county, Lochren, J., presiding, sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. cited Maples v. N. Y. & N. II. R. Go., 38 Conn. 557; Lake Erie á W. Ry. Co. v. Fix, 88 Ind. 381; Brooke v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co., 15 Mich. 332; Maroney v. Old Colony, etc., Ry. Co., 106 Mass. 153; Murdock v. Boston é A. R. Co., 137 Mass. 293; Elmore v. Sands, 54 N. Y. 512; Rawson v. Penn.
Read the full summary
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Anoka county, Lochren, J., presiding, sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. cited Maples v. N. Y. & N. II. R. Go., 38 Conn. 557; Lake Erie á W. Ry. Co. v. Fix, 88 Ind. 381; Brooke v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co., 15 Mich. 332; Maroney v. Old Colony, etc., Ry. Co., 106 Mass. 153; Murdock v. Boston é A. R. Co., 137 Mass. 293; Elmore v. Sands, 54 N. Y. 512; Rawson v. Penn. R. Co., 48 N. Y. 212; Auerbach v. N. Y. C., etc., R. Co., 89 N. Y. 281; Northern R. R. Co. v. Page, 22 Barb. 130; Townsend v. N. F. Cent, é B. R. R. Co., 4 Hun, 217;…
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This was an action for damages for unlawfully ejecting plaintiff from defendant’s train. The appeal is from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. The allegations of the complaint are that the plaintiff purchased of defendant a ticket from Anoka to St. Paul and return, and entered one of defendant’s trains at Anoka, and proceeded to St. Paul; that on the trip the conductor took up one-half of the ticket and returned the other half to the plaintiff; that on the afternoon of the same day he boarded one of the trains of the St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Company from St. Paul…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Great Western Railway Co. v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- McClure v. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
- Lillis v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1877
- Maples v. New York & New Haven RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
3Cited by7 opinions
- Haug v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. Tuggle's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Hardenbergh v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Rudy v. Rio Grande Western Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1892
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. ParrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.