Denlinger v. Mudgett
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C.J.
Defendants appeal the order of the Lamoille Superior Court entering judgment for plaintiffs in this misrepresentation action. We affirm.
The trial court found the following facts. Plaintiffs purchased eighteen acres of property in Morrisville from defendants, for the purpose of building a residence. In deciding to purchase the property, plaintiffs relied in part on the statement of defendants’ broker that the land had passed a percolation test, making it suitable for an in-ground septic system. At the time the broker made the statement, he had been told by the defendants that the property had…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Foust v. Valleybrook Realty Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1981
- Hunt v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
- Negyessy v. StrongSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
- Smith v. De MetreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1955
- Byrn v. WalkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Silva v. StevensSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- Vermont National Bank v. ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- Citibank, N.A. v. GroshensSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Darden v. O'KeefeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Woodbine Condominium Ass'n v. LoweSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.