Legal Opinion

City of Milwaukee v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The state has set apart property, used in railroad and utility operation, to be assessed for certain taxation purposes by the state tax commission, leaving other property to be assessed by local authorities. The tax com*76mission is required to make an annual assessment of the property of all railroad companies within this state for the purpose of levying and collecting taxes thereon. When there is included in this assessment and levy railroad property used in transferring freight or passengers between cars and vessels, then “for the purpose of accounting to’ the proper assessment districts, the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Dickerman v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Gymnastic Ass'n of the South Side of Milwaukee v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Mutual Life Insurance v. O'DonnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Aberg v. MoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Slater v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1868

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Union Falls Power Co. v. Marinette CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Empire Gas of Rochester, Inc. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Bowlin v. Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Nash v. Towamensing Mutual Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Carbon County1974
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API