Legal Opinion

Hayman v. Sitmar Cruises, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 15, 1993No. B058688PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOFFMAN, J. *

Introduction

Plaintiff and appellant Clarice Hayman (appellant) appeals from a judgment entered against her and in favor of defendants and respondents Sitmar Cruises, Inc. (Sitmar) and Princess Cruises, Inc. (Princess) (Sitmar and Princess are referred to collectively as respondents) after the grant of respondents’ motion for summary judgment on the ground appellant’s action was barred for her failure to effect service within one year. We reverse the judgment.

Statement of Facts and Procedural History

On July 19, 1988, appellant, a passenger aboard the cruise ship Fairwind, 1…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. The Moses TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Sprecher v. Adamson CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Krieger v. Nick Alexander Imports, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Frazier, Dame, Doherty, Parrish & Hanawalt v. Boccardo, Blum, Lull, Niland, Teerlink & BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schlessinger v. Holland America, N.V.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Korman v. Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. BMO Bank N.A. v. CheemaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  4. Korman v. Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2019
  5. Schlessinger v. Holland America, N.V.California Court of Appeal · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API