Legal Opinion

Bishop v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 22, 1989No. 89-1099PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm, but do so without prejudice to the appellant’s right to file an amended motion for post-conviction relief in the trial court within 90 days of this opinion, containing specific statements as to the contents of the Brady material allegedly improperly denied to the appellant. In Bishop v. State, 527 So.2d 836 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), we affirmed the denial of a similar motion filed by appellant without prejudice to appellant’s right to file again. Our purpose was to give the appellant an opportunity to specifically allege the contents of the Brady material so that the trial court could…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bishop v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McCann v. FoisyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API