Legal Opinion

Pacific Employers Insurance v. Sav-A-Lot of Winchester

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 24, 2002No. 00-6187PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judge.

When a pleading is amended to change the party against whom a claim is asserted, as first year civil procedure students routinely learn, the amendment “relates back,” under certain conditions, to the date of the original pleading. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the conditions that must be satisfied if the relation-back doctrine is to apply are not always identical to the conditions that must be satisfied under state civil procedure rules — and the case at bar, where the applicability of Kentucky’s version of the relation-back doctrine is at…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Deborah W. Kane and Andrew Kane v. Magna Mixer Company and Paul L. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  3. Luverne L. Anderson and Josephine Rodriguez v. Allstate Insurance Company, a California Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. Remington v. Central Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Redfield v. Continental Casualty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pacific Employers Insurance Company v. Sav-A-Lot Of WinchesterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API