Legal Opinion

Gritzer v. CBS, .Inc

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 3, 2002No. 01-1979PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

BARRY, Circuit Judge.

This case, at bottom, is about whether the word “may” means “may” or whether it means “must.” We are also called upon to determine the appropriate standard of review where a pension plan allows for discretion but discretion is not exercised. The District court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and will affirm.

I

In spite of the voluminous record and the lengthy briefs, this is, again at bottom, a contract interpretation class action with some ERISA bells and whistles. Appellants are a group…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Moench v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. Maria H. Pinto v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  4. Bernice v. Mansker, Individually and as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Michael Mansker, Deceased v. Tmg Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  5. Marolt v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Abatie v. Alta Health & Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Fleisher v. Standard InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  3. Leahy v. Raytheon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  4. Donald Jebian v. Hewlett-Packard Company Employee Benefits Organization Income Protection Plan Erisa PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Gilbertson v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API