Legal Opinion

Passavant v. Cantor

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1888PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York county; O’Brien, Justice. Action by Herman Passavant and another against Herman Cantor and Isaac Sickle, to set aside as fraudulent a general assignment for benefit of •creditors made by Sickle to Cantor.

Read the full summary

Appeal from special term, New York county; O’Brien, Justice. Action by Herman Passavant and another against Herman Cantor and Isaac Sickle, to set aside as fraudulent a general assignment for benefit of •creditors made by Sickle to Cantor. The motion of defendant Cantor for a bill of particulars as to certain matters set up in the complaint was denied, •and the following opinion delivered: “O’Brien, J. The defendant assignee asked for a bill of particulars of •certain matters relating to plaintiff’s cause of action, which alleges fraud by the assignor, invalidating an assignment for the…

1Per curiam

The careful opinion of the learned judge in the court below gives ample reason for the denial of the motion. The order appealed from should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Isaac v. WilischNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Constable v. HardenberghNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Faxon v. BallNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Home-Maker Co. v. AlleyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API