Legal Opinion

Hulse v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 29, 1976No. Civ. 38360PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RATTIGAN, Acting P. J.

In proceedings regularly conducted upon his application for benefits pursuant to the workers’ compensation law, P. illip Hulse (hereinafter “applicant”) was granted an award which, ar long other things, entitled him to receive weekly permanent disability payments over a period of eight years. He petitioned respondent Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board for “commutation,” or lump sum payment, of the permanent disability award pursuant to Labor Code section 5100, subdivisions (a) and (b). The stated purpose of the commutation, as proposed, was to protect him against…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Jenkins v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fowler v. Consolidated Aluminum Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Price v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. State Comp. Ins. Fund v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API