Stewart v. Capital Fertilizer Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.
The sheriff’s return imports verity and cannot be contradicted or impeached in the action in which it was made. Ingram v. Ala. Power Co., 201 Ala. 13, 75 South. 304. “The court must, of necessity, give credence to the acts of its own officers; otherwise, it7 would be impeded, at every step, by the trial of collateral issues.” Dunklin v. Wilson, 64 Ala. 162; Brown v. Turner, 11 Ala. 752. This rule does not. of course, preclude the sheriff from amending his return in proper cases so as to make it speak the truth. Nor is said return conclusive on a party to the cause upon an action against the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- D. R. Wilder Manufacturing Co. v. Corn Products Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Dunklin v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Ingram v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Greil Bros. Co. v. McLainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Regional Agricultural Credit Corp. v. HendleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Shows v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Coston-Riles Lumber Co. v. Alabama MacHinery & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Fleming v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Fowler v. NashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.