Legal Opinion

Williamson v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 18, 1934PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.

— Action under the Federal Employers’ Liability and Safety Appliance Acts to recover damages for the widow and minor child of Rushton E. Halbert who was injured at two a. m. and died at nine a. M. on February 27, 1930, while working as a switchman for defendant in its railroad yard at Memphis, Tennessee.

The petition charged a violation of the Safety Appliance Act with reference to automatic couplings, and further charged that said violation was the proximate cause of the death of Halbert. The answer was a general denial. Judgment for plaintiff for. $25,000. Defendant appealed.

Defendant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ToopsSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. McGrath v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  4. Gulf, Mobile & Northern Railroad v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Sakowski v. BairdSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harrison v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  2. Chicago, St. P., M. and O. Ry. Co. v. MuldowneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  3. Hendricks v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Truesdale v. WheelockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  5. Donnelly v. Pennsylvania RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API