Dixon v. Haft

This is an appeal from a judgment for costs in favor of the defendant, Herbert H. Haft, entered on a jury verdict in an action at law brought by William E. Dixon and Joseph Schwartz for damages for breach of a contract to purchase real estate. 1 We shall reverse and remand for a new trial because we are satisfied that the court below erred in denying an instruction requested by the plaintiffs Dixon and Schwartz.

This case was before us just two years ago, Dixon v. Haft, 253 Md. 692, 253 A. 2d 715 (1969). There we reversed an order sustaining Haft’s demurrer, treating it as an order sustaining…