Sanderson v. Bradford
Superior Court of New Hampshire
Foheign attachment. The trustee stated, in his disclosure, that at the time of the service of the plaintiffs’ writ on him, April 28, 1837, hewas indebted to the defendant, on account, to the amount of $ 177-59 ; and that on the 24th day of April, 1837, the defendant, by a deed of assignment, a copy of which was annexed and made apart of the disclosure, bargained, sold, consigned and transferred to one William Greenough all his lands, tenements, goods, chattels, choses in…
Read the full summary
Foheign attachment. The trustee stated, in his disclosure, that at the time of the service of the plaintiffs’ writ on him, April 28, 1837, hewas indebted to the defendant, on account, to the amount of $ 177-59 ; and that on the 24th day of April, 1837, the defendant, by a deed of assignment, a copy of which was annexed and made apart of the disclosure, bargained, sold, consigned and transferred to one William Greenough all his lands, tenements, goods, chattels, choses in action, property and effects, of whatsoever name, nature and kind, and wheresoever the same might be ; and the trustee…
1Opinion of the CourtParker, C. J.
This case has been argued by the counsel for the plaintiffs, on the apparent assumption that the plaintiffs are citizens of this state ; and by the counsel for the defendants, as if the plaintiffs were inhabitants of Massachusetts. The disclosure of the trustee contains nothing upon this point; but upon an inspection of the writ it appears that the plaintiffs are there described as inhabitants of Sheffield, in England, and as there is no evidence in the case to show that they have in fact any other domicil, we must take their residence to be as it appears by the record. Such being the case,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Holmes v. RemsenNew York Court of Chancery · 1820
- Saunders v. WilliamsSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1830
3Cited by1 opinion
- Crippen v. RogersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1892