Legal Opinion

King v. Guy

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 1957No. 7455Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing

In his vigorous motion for rehearing, plaintiff insists that his suit was for damages for breach of warranty and that we have wronged him in holding that it was for rescission or, characterized more accurately and precisely, for recovery of the consideration paid by plaintiff under the rescinded contract of sale. When “it [thus] becomes necessary to determine the nature of the cause, that determination is based upon construction of the complaint” [Williams v. Illinois Cent. R. Co., 360 Mo. 501, 229 S.W.2d 1, 2(3), 20 A.L.R.2d 322; Hilderbrand v. Anderson, Mo.App., 270…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Gerber v. Schutte Investment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  2. Welch v. McNeelySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. Christian v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  4. Kleinlein v. FoskinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  5. Conrad v. Diehl.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API