Legal Opinion
City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 30, 1977No. Nos. 316, 1202 and 1203, Dockets 76-7252, 76-7253 and 76-7254PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge:
David Berger, P.A. (Berger), counsel for class representatives, by motion (Rule 37, F.R.A.P.), requests this court to amend its mandate, issued on November 28, 1977, which contained no instructions as to the allowance of interest. The motion, on what is in effect a nunc pro tunc basis, asks us to include such instructions in an amended mandate. Since the omission of such instructions as to interest was an oversight, the motion is granted.
Only attorneys’ fees and interest thereon are now involved. The original judgment (January 26, 1973) awarded Berger $1,500,-000 for his…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
3Cited by12 opinions
- Michael J. Foley v. City of Lowell, Massachusetts, Michael J. Foley v. City of Lowell, MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Gagne v. MaherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Williamsburg Fair Housing Committee v. Ross-Rodney Housing Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Georgia Association of Retarded Citizens v. Dr. Charles McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Rosenberg v. Jack Foley Realty, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.