Legal Opinion

Zucker v. . Oettinger

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 3, 1920PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion for Removal, heard before Connor, J., at January Term, 1920, of Pitt. Motion was allowed, and plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This is an action brought against the defendants to recover the balance due on account of goods sold and delivered.

The plaintiffs are residents of the city of New York, and the defendants are residents of the county of Wilson. Summons was issued by the clerk of the Superior Court of Pitt County, under chapter 304, Acts of 1919.

The plaintiff filed his verified complaint, and the defendant, before filing answer and before return time, appeared before the clerk and demanded removal of the same to the county of the defendants.

Thereupon the clerk made an order transferring the same to the Superior…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clark v. . HomesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Clark v. Carolina Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Howard v. . HinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. GrimesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API