Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Bushnell

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 1919Published

Error.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

The plaintiff, both in error and below, was in the lifetime of Mary S. Bradford and at her death, a collateral relative of the latter, to wit: a cousin-german. In default of descendants in the direct line, upon her decease he would have been her heir at law, upon whom, if she had died intestate, her estate would have been settled by devolution to him.

Mary S. Bradford at her death left a paper in due form of her last will and testament, and purporting to be such, and which as her last will has been duly admitted to probate and proved in the court to which the jurisdiction for that purpose…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chehak v. BattlesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Erwin v. LowrySupreme Court of the United States · 1849
  3. Florentine v. BartonSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  4. Fish v. . EmersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. Lynch v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API