Application of Houk
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.
This opinion involves two appeals from separate orders rendered in separate proceedings by the Nebraska State Railway Commission, hereinafter called the commission. In this court the appeals were separately docketed but consolidated for briefing, argument, and decision. They will be generally referred to as dockets No. 33882 and No. 33883, and will be decided separately in that order.
On December 2, 1953, Earl Houk and Frank Woodrow, partners, doing business as Western Transport Service, hereinafter called applicant, filed an application, No. M-6859, supplement 3, seeking to extend the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Canada v. Transit Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1951
- Union Transfer Co. v. Bee Line Motor FreightNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
- Richling v. Transit, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1951
- Schmunk v. West Nebraska Express, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1954
- Application of DaltonNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Preisendorf Transport, Inc. v. Herman Bros.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1960
- Black Hills Stage Lines, Inc. v. Greyhound Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1962
- American Bus Lines, Inc. v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1981
- Application of NeuswangerNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
- Miller v. Consolidated Motor Freight, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.