Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Wetumpka v. Culverhouse

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 8, 1935No. 5 Div. 964Published

1Opinion of the Court

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

This is an action of assumpsit to re- . cover a sum of money alleged to be due upon a promissory note made by appellees on the 5th day of April, 1926, and payable on the 21st day of June, 1927, together with interest and attorneys’ fees alleged to be due under the provisions of said note.

Demurrers of the defendants being overruled, they filed pleas of the general issue and of payment to the complaint, and also the following plea: “4. For further answer to the complaint and each and every . count thereof said defendants say and aver as follows: that on or about July…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  2. Central Iron & Coal Co. v. WrightAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. GrauerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. First Nat. Bank v. Huntsville Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Birmingham Baptist Hospital v. BrantonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API