Legal Opinion

People v. Kaeding

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 19, 1989No. Nos. 2—88—0464, 2—88—0555 consPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant, Gary Kaeding, appeals from two orders finding him in direct criminal contempt of court. We affirm in part and vacate and remand in part.

On February 25, 1988, the defendant appeared in the trial court and stated he was Dennis H. Anderson, a party in the case called for hearing. The defendant repeatedly represented himself to be Dennis Anderson, even though the court personally knew he was Gary Kaeding. The court therefore found the defendant in direct criminal contempt for misrepresenting his identity to the court.

Thereafter, the defendant filed a civil suit in Federal court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. JashunskyIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. WaldronIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  3. People v. DravesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. People Ex Rel. Finck v. LocherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. People v. WhitlockAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kaeding v. CollinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  2. People v. KaedingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. Kaeding v. CollinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API