Legal Opinion
Ferenczy v. Murray Hill Partners
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 2, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment, Supreme *69Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered April 12, 1999, dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiffs case, and bringing up for review an order, same court (Barbara Kapnick, J.), entered March 18, 1998, which denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiffs Labor Law § 200 and common-law negligence claims were properly dismissed for lack of evidence that defendant directed or controlled the contractor’s work (see, Comes v New York State Elec. & Gas Corp., 82 NY2d 876, 877). Plaintiffs argument that he was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Comes v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Serpe v. Eyris Productions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Kahn v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
3Cited by2 opinions
- DiPasquale v. Security Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Sandcham Realty Corp. v. TaubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002