Legal Opinion
One West Bank, F.S.B. v. Bauer
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 30, 2014No. 2D12-5393PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge.
In this mortgage foreclosure action, One West Bank seeks certiorari review of the order entered in favor of homeowners Christine and Thomas Bauer.1 Because we conclude the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law in finding that One West Bank failed to establish its standing to foreclose, we grant its petition for writ of certiorari.
In August 2009, One West Bank brought suit to foreclose a mortgage on real estate owned by the Bauers. The complaint alleged that Christine Bauer executed the promissory note, which was payable to In-dyMac Bank, F.S.B. (“IndyMac”),…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mazine v. M & I BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- BAC Funding Consortium Inc. ISAOA/ATIMA v. Jean-JacquesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Fassy v. CrowleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Mortgage Electronic Registration v. AzizeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Stone v. BankUnitedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Russell v. Aurora Loan Services, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- In re LesterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2019
- RICHARD C. BARTEL v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATIONDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- RICHARD C. BARTEL v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATIONDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- RICHARD C. BARTEL v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATIONDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015