Legal Opinion

Gray v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 8, 1993No. A92A2186PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

Curtis O’Neal Gray appeals his convictions for burglary and aggravated assault with intent to rape. Gray contends the trial court erred by denying his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal and by denying his motion to suppress evidence resulting from his alleged illegal arrest. Held:

1. Gray’s contention that the trial court erred by denying his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal is without merit. Granting such a motion is authorized only when there is no conflict in the evidence and the evidence with all reasonable deductions and inferences therefrom…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Humphrey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  4. Bethay v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  5. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. BrodieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. Pless v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  4. Howie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. BUDHANI v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API